<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Revlayer press roundup</title>
	<atom:link href="http://web2newyork.com/blog/2007/07/revlayer-press-roundup/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://web2newyork.com/blog/2007/07/revlayer-press-roundup/</link>
	<description>Networking for post-internet media, advertising and business</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Jun 2010 14:48:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Allen Stern</title>
		<link>http://web2newyork.com/blog/2007/07/revlayer-press-roundup/comment-page-1/#comment-191</link>
		<dc:creator>Allen Stern</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2007 01:41:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://web2newyork.com/blog/2007/07/22/revlayer-press-roundup/#comment-191</guid>
		<description>To clarify the comment on VentureBeat - the &quot;we&quot; in &quot;we see fit&quot; are site owners and bloggers. Not &quot;we&quot; as in Revlayer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To clarify the comment on VentureBeat &#8211; the &#8220;we&#8221; in &#8220;we see fit&#8221; are site owners and bloggers. Not &#8220;we&#8221; as in Revlayer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: adam quirk</title>
		<link>http://web2newyork.com/blog/2007/07/revlayer-press-roundup/comment-page-1/#comment-190</link>
		<dc:creator>adam quirk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 17:51:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://web2newyork.com/blog/2007/07/22/revlayer-press-roundup/#comment-190</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s incredibly obtrusive.  You can barely tell there&#039;s a video under there.  If it were 70% opacity it might be slightly less disgusting, but I still wouldn&#039;t want it on my site.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s incredibly obtrusive.  You can barely tell there&#8217;s a video under there.  If it were 70% opacity it might be slightly less disgusting, but I still wouldn&#8217;t want it on my site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
