<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: YouTube is kicking tires</title>
	<atom:link href="http://web2newyork.com/blog/2007/06/youtube-is-kicking-tires/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://web2newyork.com/blog/2007/06/youtube-is-kicking-tires/</link>
	<description>Networking for post-internet media, advertising and business</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Jun 2010 14:48:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Robert</title>
		<link>http://web2newyork.com/blog/2007/06/youtube-is-kicking-tires/comment-page-1/#comment-185</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 07:39:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://web2newyork.com/blog/2007/06/30/youtube-is-kicking-tires/#comment-185</guid>
		<description>Web2NewYork is in fact right
It seems they&#039;re not interested in acquiring technology to monetize video but simply getting ideas (to put it nicely) from established market leaders like VideoClix to build the technology in house.

But one look at the two solutions and you can see who has the expertise and UI design to provide a great interactive video experience.. and who&#039;s just redistributing UGC content that no advertiser wants to be associated with.

Looks like google has lots to learn. maybe they&#039;re better off buying it... they dont seem to be able to pull it off with all the money in the world.

Rob</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Web2NewYork is in fact right<br />
It seems they&#8217;re not interested in acquiring technology to monetize video but simply getting ideas (to put it nicely) from established market leaders like VideoClix to build the technology in house.</p>
<p>But one look at the two solutions and you can see who has the expertise and UI design to provide a great interactive video experience.. and who&#8217;s just redistributing UGC content that no advertiser wants to be associated with.</p>
<p>Looks like google has lots to learn. maybe they&#8217;re better off buying it&#8230; they dont seem to be able to pull it off with all the money in the world.</p>
<p>Rob</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Web2NewYork &#187; Blog Archive &#187; YouTube debuts ad system</title>
		<link>http://web2newyork.com/blog/2007/06/youtube-is-kicking-tires/comment-page-1/#comment-184</link>
		<dc:creator>Web2NewYork &#187; Blog Archive &#187; YouTube debuts ad system</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Aug 2007 17:34:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://web2newyork.com/blog/2007/06/30/youtube-is-kicking-tires/#comment-184</guid>
		<description>[...] talking to many startups over the last year YouTube picked their best ideas and came up with these overlay ads. Apologies [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] talking to many startups over the last year YouTube picked their best ideas and came up with these overlay ads. Apologies [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
